Commonwealth Don on Democracy
A storm has been whipped up regarding a speech made by Don McKinnon, Secretary General of the Commonwealth, regarding a speech he made in Malta regarding democracy at the recent CHOGM meeting.
""Many people are beginning to ask whether building a democracy is really the road to prosperity," he said in his address.
"Does democracy put food on our tables, clothe our children, put roofs over our heads, or give us a future."
Trade was not just an engine for economic growth, but was the most potent weapon to combat poverty, he told Commonwealth leaders. "
Aaron Bhatnagar makes the good point that
"If I recall my lectures correctly, Buchanan said that the building of democratic institutions was a prerequisite for successful democracy. Quite often, this process is best done slowly, guaranteeing stability as the regime makes its transition from despotic to democratic state."
I see two ways of looking at this that I don’t think are fundamentally in contradiction but leave me on both sides of the argument.
1) I don’t like anything that could be used to support a despot like Mugabe or to justify moving away from democracy in general so in that sense I might oppose him
BUT
2) I accept that
A) Aaron is right - a slow movement towards democracy will result in more robust democracy
B) I would go further to say that in theory a non democracy could do everything a democracy does and more (the problem of course is that the vast majority don’t certainly not at the moment).
So I think what he said might be against the commonwealth's and Most of our general objectives based on 1 but not untrue considering 2.
""Many people are beginning to ask whether building a democracy is really the road to prosperity," he said in his address.
"Does democracy put food on our tables, clothe our children, put roofs over our heads, or give us a future."
Trade was not just an engine for economic growth, but was the most potent weapon to combat poverty, he told Commonwealth leaders. "
Aaron Bhatnagar makes the good point that
"If I recall my lectures correctly, Buchanan said that the building of democratic institutions was a prerequisite for successful democracy. Quite often, this process is best done slowly, guaranteeing stability as the regime makes its transition from despotic to democratic state."
I see two ways of looking at this that I don’t think are fundamentally in contradiction but leave me on both sides of the argument.
1) I don’t like anything that could be used to support a despot like Mugabe or to justify moving away from democracy in general so in that sense I might oppose him
BUT
2) I accept that
A) Aaron is right - a slow movement towards democracy will result in more robust democracy
B) I would go further to say that in theory a non democracy could do everything a democracy does and more (the problem of course is that the vast majority don’t certainly not at the moment).
So I think what he said might be against the commonwealth's and Most of our general objectives based on 1 but not untrue considering 2.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home